Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Panasonic

Lumix S1R II

High-resolution 44.3MP full-frame L-mount body with 8K video, phase hybrid AF, and compact S-series ergonomics.

$3,299

Released Feb 2025

Lumix S1R II is 2.3 years newer.

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

6categories

Lumix S1R II

Video & HybridPortrait

5 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 3 categories·Lumix S1R II wins 2 categories
  • BLumix S1R II has higher Max video bit rate (1900 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 70 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 350 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • BLumix S1R II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IILumix S1R II
Resolution24.2 MP44.3 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps40 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight680 g795 g
Battery760 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Lumix S1R II

134 × 102 × 92 mm

795 g (1.75 lb / 28.04 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm shorter and 3mm thinner than Lumix S1R II but it is also 4mm wider.

EOS R6 Mark II is 115 g lighter than Lumix S1R II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 92mm Lumix S1R II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Lumix S1R II

134 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Lumix S1R II

134 × 92 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lumix S1R II

35.8 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

856 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix S1R II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IILumix S1R II
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 70 frames — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 779 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix S1R II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 91.8

  • Max video bit rate

    1900 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes RAW, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, MOV…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • Resolution

    44.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 40 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Lumix S1R II

Pros

  • 44.3MP full-frame BSI sensor
  • 8K video
  • Phase Hybrid AF
  • CFexpress plus SD workflow

Cons

  • Large high-res files
  • Premium price
  • L-mount lens size

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S1R II
Resolution
24.2 MP
44.3 MP+83%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
35mm Full-Frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.8 x 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S1R II
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
1053+35%
779
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S1R II
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+20%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
40 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames2.6× more
70 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S1R II
Max resolution
4K UHD
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
1900 Mbps5.6× more
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
V-Log / ARRI LogC3
Codecs
H.265, H.264
Apple ProRes RAW, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, H.265, H.264, MOV, MP4
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S1R II
Weight
680 g−115 g less
795 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
134.3 × 102.3 × 91.8 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, EOS R6 Mark II or Lumix S1R II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 4.5/10 for Lumix S1R II — 680g — manageable for travel.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R II?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Lumix S1R II is 44.3 MP, so the Lumix S1R II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix S1R II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Lumix S1R II?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix S1R II reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R II?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Lumix S1R II weighs 795 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 115 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R II record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Lumix S1R II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R II weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Lumix S1R II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 350 shots for the Lumix S1R II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Lumix S1R II at $3,299. The EOS R6 Mark II is $800 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.