Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Panasonic

Lumix ZS80

Pocket superzoom with 30x Leica lens, tilting selfie screen, EVF, and 4K video.

$449

Released Feb 2019

vs

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Released Jan 2026

GR IV is 6.8 years newer.

Wins

4categories

Lumix ZS80

Wins

4categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

2 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix ZS80 wins 3 categories·GR IV wins 2 categories
  • BGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 3,200)
  • ALumix ZS80 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
  • ALumix ZS80 has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR IV has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • ALumix ZS80 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (380 shots vs 250 shots)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix ZS80GR IV
Resolution20.3 MP25.74 MP
Sensor6.17 x 4.55 mmAPS-C
ISO max3,200204,800
Burst30 fps4 fps
4K30 fps60 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight328 g262 g
Battery380 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix ZS80

112 × 69 × 42 mm

328 g (0.72 lb / 11.57 oz)

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

Lumix ZS80 is 3mm wider, 8mm taller, and 9mm thicker than GR IV.

Lumix ZS80 is 66 g heavier than GR IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 42mm Lumix ZS80 · 33mm GR IV

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix ZS80

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

12.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix ZS80GR IV
Portrait
3.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.0Fair✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
3.0Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
2.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
4.0Fair✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
3.5Limited
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix ZS80

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, MP4

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112, 68.8, 41.6

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only Lumix ZS80 supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    380 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • In-body stabilization

    Only GR IV supports it

  • Resolution

    25.74 MP vs 20.3 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    262 g vs 328 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AF points / zonesBoth 49
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix ZS80

Pros

  • 30x 24-720mm equivalent zoom
  • Built-in EVF
  • Tilting selfie screen
  • 4K video

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • Limited low light
  • Compact controls

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Lumix ZS80 and GR IV at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix ZS80
GR IV
Resolution
20.3 MP
25.74 MP+27%
Sensor type
1/2.3-inch BSI MOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
6.17 x 4.55 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
Lumix ZS80
GR IV
AF system
Contrast AF with DFD technology
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
49
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Face, Eye
Lumix ZS80
GR IV
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps2.5× more
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps7.5× more
4 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
10 frames
Lumix ZS80
GR IV
Max resolution
4K
Full HD
4K max frame rate
30 fps
60 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
100 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
None
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.264, MP4
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Lumix ZS80
GR IV
Weight
328 g
262 g−66 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
112 × 68.8 × 41.6 mm
109.4 × 61.1 × 32.7 mm
Weather sealing
No
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, Lumix ZS80 or GR IV?

GR IV scores 6.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for Lumix ZS80 — 25.74MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix ZS80 and GR IV?

Lumix ZS80 is 20.3 MP and GR IV is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix ZS80 and GR IV have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix ZS80 does not have IBIS, while gR IV has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix ZS80 or the GR IV?

Lumix ZS80 reaches 30 fps electronic. GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix ZS80 and GR IV?

Lumix ZS80 weighs 328 g and GR IV weighs 262 g, so the GR IV is 66 g lighter.

Do the Lumix ZS80 and GR IV record 4K video?

Lumix ZS80: 4K up to 30p. GR IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Lumix ZS80 and GR IV weather sealed?

Lumix ZS80: No. GR IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 380 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix ZS80 and 250 shots for the GR IV, giving the Lumix ZS80 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix ZS80 launched at $449 and GR IV at $1,499. The Lumix ZS80 is $1,050 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.