Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Pentax

K-1 Mark II

36MP full-frame DSLR with IBIS and rugged build.

$1,999

Released Feb 2018

vs

Sony

Alpha 9 III

Global shutter sports flagship with 120fps and zero rolling shutter for pro action.

$5,999

Released Jan 2024

Alpha 9 III is 5.9 years newer.

Wins

5categories

K-1 Mark II

WildlifePortrait

Wins

11categories

Alpha 9 III

WildlifeSports & Action

2 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

K-1 Mark II wins 1 categories·Alpha 9 III wins 4 categories
  • AK-1 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 0 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 101)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 20 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 3,690,000)

Key specs at a glance

K-1 Mark IIAlpha 9 III
Resolution36 MP24.6 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst20 fps120 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS7-stop8-stop
Weight720 g703 g
Battery640 shots400 shots

Size and weight, to scale

K-1 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 × 83 mm

703 g (1.55 lb / 24.80 oz)

K-1 Mark II is 2mm wider, 1mm taller, and 5mm thicker than Alpha 9 III.

K-1 Mark II is 17 g heavier than Alpha 9 III.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm K-1 Mark II · 83mm Alpha 9 III

Sensor size, to scale

K-1 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 9 III

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

K-1 Mark II

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Alpha 9 III

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseK-1 Mark IIAlpha 9 III
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
6.0Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

K-1 Mark II

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 250 — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 400 shots — higher is better

  • Resolution

    36 MP vs 24.6 MP — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Vehicle

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 9 III

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 101 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car/Train, Airplane

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

K-1 Mark II

Pros

  • 36MP FF DSLR
  • IBIS
  • Rugged
  • Affordable used

Cons

  • DSLR
  • Slow AF
  • Heavy

Alpha 9 III

Pros

  • Global shutter 120fps
  • Zero rolling shutter
  • Pro sports AF
  • Pre-capture buffer

Cons

  • 24.6MP only
  • Premium price
  • Battery drain at max speed

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the K-1 Mark II and Alpha 9 III at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

K-1 Mark II
Alpha 9 III
Resolution
36 MP+46%
24.6 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Global Shutter Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
K-1 Mark II
Alpha 9 III
AF system
SAFOX 12
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
101
7597.5× more
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-3 EV
-5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
K-1 Mark II
Alpha 9 III
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps
0 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps
120 fps6× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
120 frames
200 frames+67%
K-1 Mark II
Alpha 9 III
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
600 Mbps4× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
K-1 Mark II
Alpha 9 III
Weight
720 g
703 g−17 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
136.1 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, K-1 Mark II or Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 9 III scores 9.0/10 versus 6.0/10 for K-1 Mark II — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the K-1 Mark II and Alpha 9 III?

K-1 Mark II is 36 MP and Alpha 9 III is 24.6 MP, so the K-1 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the K-1 Mark II and Alpha 9 III have in-body image stabilization?

K-1 Mark II has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 9 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the K-1 Mark II or the Alpha 9 III?

K-1 Mark II reaches 20 fps electronic. Alpha 9 III reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the K-1 Mark II and Alpha 9 III?

K-1 Mark II weighs 720 g and Alpha 9 III weighs 703 g, so the Alpha 9 III is 17 g lighter.

Do the K-1 Mark II and Alpha 9 III record 4K video?

K-1 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 9 III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the K-1 Mark II and Alpha 9 III weather sealed?

K-1 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 9 III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the K-1 Mark II and 400 shots for the Alpha 9 III, giving the K-1 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

K-1 Mark II launched at $1,999 and Alpha 9 III at $5,999. The K-1 Mark II is $4,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.