Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Pentax

K-3 II

24MP APS-C DSLR with pixel shift resolution, GPS, and no AA filter for detail-focused work.

$1,099

Launch price

Released Apr 2015

vs

Pentax

K-3 Mark III

APS-C DSLR flagship with optical viewfinder and weather sealing.

$1,999

Launch price

Released Apr 2021

K-3 Mark III is 6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

0categories

K-3 II

WildlifeTravel

Wins

7categories

K-3 Mark III

WildlifeTravel

11 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

K-3 II wins 0 categories·K-3 Mark III wins 5 categories
  • BK-3 Mark III has higher RAW buffer depth (120 frames vs 60 frames)
  • BK-3 Mark III has higher EVF resolution (3,690,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BK-3 Mark III has lower Weight (520 g vs 700 g)
  • BK-3 Mark III has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 6 fps)
  • BK-3 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 15 fps)

Key specs at a glance

K-3 IIK-3 Mark III
Resolution24.4 MP25.7 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst15 fps20 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stop7-stop
Weight700 g520 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

K-3 II

132 × 102 × 78 mm

700 g (1.54 lb / 24.69 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

K-3 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

K-3 II is 7mm narrower and 11mm thinner than K-3 Mark III but it is also 4mm taller.

K-3 II is 180 g heavier than K-3 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 78mm K-3 II · 88mm K-3 Mark III

Sensor size, to scale

K-3 II

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

K-3 Mark III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

K-3 II

✓ more lenses

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

K-3 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseK-3 IIK-3 Mark III
Portrait
6.5Good
6.5Good
Sports & Action
6.5Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
6.0Good
Landscape
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Travel
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
9.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

K-3 II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.5, 101.5, 77.5

Reasons to choose

K-3 Mark III

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • RAW buffer depth

    120 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Weight

    520 g vs 700 g — lower is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 6 stops — higher is better

  • Resolution

    25.7 MP vs 24.4 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 101
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

K-3 II

Pros

  • Pixel shift hi-res
  • No AA filter
  • GPS built-in
  • Weather sealed

Cons

  • Superseded by K-3 III
  • DSLR
  • Limited video

K-3 Mark III

Pros

  • Optical viewfinder
  • Weather sealed
  • IBIS in DSLR

Cons

  • DSLR system declining
  • APS-C
  • Limited video

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the K-3 II and K-3 Mark III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

K-3 II
K-3 Mark III
Resolution
24.4 MP
25.7 MP+5%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 × 15.6 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
K-3 II
K-3 Mark III
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
K-3 II
K-3 Mark III
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
K-3 II
K-3 Mark III
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, K-3 II or K-3 Mark III?

K-3 Mark III scores 7.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for K-3 II — 4K 60p for smooth handheld vlogs.

What's the resolution difference between the K-3 II and K-3 Mark III?

K-3 II is 24.4 MP and K-3 Mark III is 25.7 MP, so the K-3 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the K-3 II and K-3 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

K-3 II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while K-3 Mark III has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the K-3 II or the K-3 Mark III?

K-3 II reaches 15 fps electronic. K-3 Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the K-3 II and K-3 Mark III?

K-3 II weighs 700 g and K-3 Mark III weighs 520 g, so the K-3 Mark III is 180 g lighter.

Do the K-3 II and K-3 Mark III record 4K video?

K-3 II: 4K up to 60p. K-3 Mark III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the K-3 II and K-3 Mark III weather sealed?

K-3 II: Yes. K-3 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the K-3 II and 640 shots for the K-3 Mark III, giving the K-3 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

K-3 II launched at $1,099 and K-3 Mark III at $1,999. The K-3 II is $900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way K-3 II vs K-3 Mark III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.