Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs

Pentax

K-3 II

24MP APS-C DSLR with pixel shift resolution, GPS, and no AA filter for detail-focused work.

$1,099

Launch price

Released Apr 2015

EOS R1 is 9.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

K-3 II

WildlifeTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 5 categories·K-3 II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 101)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 640 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1K-3 II
Resolution24.2 MP24.4 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6-stop
Weight920 g700 g
Battery1330 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

K-3 II

132 × 102 × 78 mm

700 g (1.54 lb / 24.69 oz)

EOS R1 is 26mm wider, 48mm taller, and 10mm thicker than K-3 II.

EOS R1 is 220 g heavier than K-3 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 78mm K-3 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

K-3 II

132 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

K-3 II

132 × 78 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

K-3 II

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

K-3 II

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1K-3 II
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 101 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,440,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

K-3 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.5, 101.5, 77.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Weight

    700 g vs 920 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    24.4 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

K-3 II

Pros

  • Pixel shift hi-res
  • No AA filter
  • GPS built-in
  • Weather sealed

Cons

  • Superseded by K-3 III
  • DSLR
  • Limited video

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and K-3 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
K-3 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.4 MP+1%
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R1
K-3 II
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R1
K-3 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
102,400
EOS R1
K-3 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R1 or K-3 II?

EOS R1 scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for K-3 II — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and K-3 II?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and K-3 II is 24.4 MP, so the K-3 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and K-3 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while K-3 II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the K-3 II?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. K-3 II reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and K-3 II?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and K-3 II weighs 700 g, so the K-3 II is 220 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and K-3 II record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. K-3 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R1 and K-3 II weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. K-3 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 640 shots for the K-3 II, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and K-3 II at $1,099. The K-3 II is $5,200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs K-3 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Pentax press materials.