Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Pentax

K-3 Mark III

APS-C DSLR flagship with optical viewfinder and weather sealing.

$1,999

Launch price

Released Apr 2021

vs

Pentax

K-S2

Compact weather-sealed APS-C DSLR with 20MP sensor, AA filter simulator, and built-in Wi-Fi.

$799

Launch price

Released Feb 2015

K-3 Mark III is 6.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

K-3 Mark III

WildlifeTravel

Wins

0categories

K-S2

WildlifeSports & Action

11 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

K-3 Mark III wins 5 categories·K-S2 wins 0 categories
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher RAW buffer depth (120 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher EVF resolution (3,690,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 6 fps)
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AK-3 Mark III has lower Weight (520 g vs 678 g)

Key specs at a glance

K-3 Mark IIIK-S2
Resolution25.7 MP20.1 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst20 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stop6-stop
Weight520 g678 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

K-3 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

K-S2

123 × 91 × 77 mm

678 g (1.49 lb / 23.92 oz)

K-3 Mark III is 16mm wider, 7mm taller, and 11mm thicker than K-S2.

K-3 Mark III is 158 g lighter than K-S2.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm K-3 Mark III · 77mm K-S2

Sensor size, to scale

K-3 Mark III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

K-S2

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

K-3 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

K-S2

✓ more lenses

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseK-3 Mark IIIK-S2
Portrait
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
6.5Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
6.0Good
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
9.0Excellent
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

K-3 Mark III

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • RAW buffer depth

    120 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    520 g vs 678 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    25.7 MP vs 20.1 MP — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 6 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

K-S2

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 122.5, 91.4, 76.9

  • AA filter

    Only K-S2 supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 101
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

K-3 Mark III

Pros

  • Optical viewfinder
  • Weather sealed
  • IBIS in DSLR

Cons

  • DSLR system declining
  • APS-C
  • Limited video

K-S2

Pros

  • Weather sealed
  • Compact DSLR
  • AA filter simulator
  • Wi-Fi

Cons

  • 20MP dated
  • No IBIS
  • DSLR niche

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the K-3 Mark III and K-S2 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

K-3 Mark III
K-S2
Resolution
25.7 MP+28%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 × 15.6 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
K-3 Mark III
K-S2
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
K-3 Mark III
K-S2
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
K-3 Mark III
K-S2
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, K-3 Mark III or K-S2?

K-3 Mark III scores 8.5/10 versus 6.5/10 for K-S2 — 520g — compact and travel-friendly.

What's the resolution difference between the K-3 Mark III and K-S2?

K-3 Mark III is 25.7 MP and K-S2 is 20.1 MP, so the K-3 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the K-3 Mark III and K-S2 have in-body image stabilization?

K-3 Mark III has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while K-S2 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the K-3 Mark III or the K-S2?

K-3 Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic. K-S2 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the K-3 Mark III and K-S2?

K-3 Mark III weighs 520 g and K-S2 weighs 678 g, so the K-3 Mark III is 158 g lighter.

Do the K-3 Mark III and K-S2 record 4K video?

K-3 Mark III: 4K up to 60p. K-S2: 4K up to 60p.

Are the K-3 Mark III and K-S2 weather sealed?

K-3 Mark III: Yes. K-S2: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the K-3 Mark III and 640 shots for the K-S2, giving the K-S2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

K-3 Mark III launched at $1,999 and K-S2 at $799. The K-S2 is $1,200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way K-3 Mark III vs K-S2 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.