Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Pentax

K-3 Mark III

APS-C DSLR flagship with optical viewfinder and weather sealing.

$1,999

Released Apr 2021

vs

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Released Jan 2026

GR IV is 4.7 years newer.

Wins

5categories

K-3 Mark III

WildlifeTravel

Wins

3categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

K-3 Mark III wins 4 categories·GR IV wins 1 categories
  • BGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 25,600)
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 250 shots)
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (101 vs 49)
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 4 fps)

Key specs at a glance

K-3 Mark IIIGR IV
Resolution25.7 MP25.74 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max25,600204,800
Burst20 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stopYes
Weight520 g262 g
Battery640 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

K-3 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

K-3 Mark III is 29mm wider, 37mm taller, and 55mm thicker than GR IV.

K-3 Mark III is 258 g heavier than GR IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm K-3 Mark III · 33mm GR IV

Sensor size, to scale

K-3 Mark III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

K-3 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

GR IV: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseK-3 Mark IIIGR IV
Portrait
6.5Good
6.5Good
Sports & Action
6.0Good✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

K-3 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    101 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only K-3 Mark III supports it

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Weight

    262 g vs 520 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    25.74 MP vs 25.7 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

K-3 Mark III

Pros

  • Optical viewfinder
  • Weather sealed
  • IBIS in DSLR

Cons

  • DSLR system declining
  • APS-C
  • Limited video

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Full specifications

= category winner

K-3 Mark III
GR IV
Resolution
25.7 MP
25.74 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 × 15.6 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
K-3 Mark III
GR IV
AF system
SAFOX 12
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
1012.1× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Face, Eye
K-3 Mark III
GR IV
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps2× more
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps5× more
4 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
120 frames
K-3 Mark III
GR IV
Max resolution
4K UHD
Full HD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
K-3 Mark III
GR IV
Weight
520 g
262 g−258 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
109.4 × 61.1 × 32.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, K-3 Mark III or GR IV?

K-3 Mark III scores 10.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for GR IV — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the K-3 Mark III and GR IV?

K-3 Mark III is 25.7 MP and GR IV is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the K-3 Mark III and GR IV have in-body image stabilization?

K-3 Mark III has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while gR IV has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the K-3 Mark III or the GR IV?

K-3 Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic. GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the K-3 Mark III and GR IV?

K-3 Mark III weighs 520 g and GR IV weighs 262 g, so the GR IV is 258 g lighter.

Do the K-3 Mark III and GR IV record 4K video?

K-3 Mark III: 4K up to 60p. GR IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the K-3 Mark III and GR IV weather sealed?

K-3 Mark III: Yes. GR IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the K-3 Mark III and 250 shots for the GR IV, giving the K-3 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

K-3 Mark III launched at $1,999 and GR IV at $1,499. The GR IV is $500 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.