RED
KOMODO-X
Global-shutter Super 35 cinema camera with 6K REDCODE RAW, RF mount, and a larger body than KOMODO 6K.
$9,995
Launch priceReleased Aug 2023
Sigma
FP2
Pocket-sized L-Mount full-frame body with a 24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps stills, 6K OpenGate / ProRes RAW video, 70GB internal storage, and a Still/Cine mode switch.
$2,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2026
FP2 is 3.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
KOMODO-X
Wins
FP2
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AKOMODO-X has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 0 fps)
- AKOMODO-X has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
- BFP2 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- BFP2 has lower Weight (460 g vs 1190 g)
- AKOMODO-X has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
KOMODO-X
129 × 101 × 95 mm
1190 g (2.62 lb / 41.98 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FP2
112 × 71 × 41 mm
460 g (1.01 lb / 16.23 oz)
KOMODO-X is 17mm wider, 30mm taller, and 54mm thicker than FP2.
KOMODO-X is 730 g heavier than FP2.
Depth (front-to-back): 95mm KOMODO-X · 41mm FP2
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
KOMODO-X
129 × 101 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
FP2
112 × 71 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
KOMODO-X
129 × 95 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
FP2
112 × 41 mm
Sensor size, to scale
KOMODO-X
27.03 × 14.26 mm · APS-C
385 mm² area
FP2
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
2.2× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
KOMODO-X
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
FP2: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
KOMODO-X
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds REDCODE RAW, ProRes 422, ProRes 422 HQ…
IBIS effectiveness
7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 129.37, 101.26, 95.26
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
FP2
Subject recognition
Adds Animals, Birds, People
Codecs
Adds ProRes RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, H.264…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 112, 71, 41
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Weight
460 g vs 1190 g — lower is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 120 frames — higher is better
Resolution
24.5 MP vs 19.9 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Burst (electronic) — Both 20 fps
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
KOMODO-X
Pros
- ✓Global shutter 6K
- ✓REDCODE RAW
- ✓Canon RF mount
- ✓Compact cinema form
Cons
- –No IBIS
- –Cinema-first ergonomics
- –Premium media costs
FP2
Pros
- ✓World's smallest full-frame body (376g body only)
- ✓24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps electronic burst
- ✓6K OpenGate + ProRes RAW HQ, L-Log, 32-bit float audio
- ✓70GB internal storage + SD UHS-II + USB SSD
- ✓Tilting 3.15" LCD, dust/splash resistant, modular EVF-21
Cons
- –No in-body image stabilization (EIS in video only)
- –No built-in EVF — optional EVF-21 sold separately
- –Electronic shutter only
- –No headphone jack (USB audio only)
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the KOMODO-X and FP2 at major authorized retailers.
RED KOMODO-X
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, KOMODO-X or FP2?
KOMODO-X scores 10.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for FP2 — 20fps burst — fast action ready.
What's the resolution difference between the KOMODO-X and FP2?
KOMODO-X is 19.9 MP and FP2 is 24.5 MP, so the FP2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
How does stabilization compare between the KOMODO-X and FP2?
KOMODO-X does not have IBIS, while FP2 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the KOMODO-X or the FP2?
KOMODO-X reaches 20 fps electronic. FP2 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the KOMODO-X and FP2?
KOMODO-X weighs 1190 g and FP2 weighs 460 g, so the FP2 is 730 g lighter.
Do the KOMODO-X and FP2 record 4K video?
KOMODO-X: 4K up to 120p. FP2: 4K up to 59.94p.
Are the KOMODO-X and FP2 weather sealed?
KOMODO-X: Yes. FP2: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the KOMODO-X and 370 shots for the FP2, giving the KOMODO-X the edge.
How much does each cost?
KOMODO-X launched at $9,995 and FP2 at $2,199. The FP2 is $7,796 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way KOMODO-X vs FP2 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.
Product images courtesy of RED and Sigma press materials.