Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Ricoh

GR II

Classic APS-C GR with 16.2MP sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, built-in flash, Wi-Fi, and snap-focus street ergonomics.

$799

Launch price

Released Jun 2015

vs
Alpha 7 V

Sony

Alpha 7 V

33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.

$2,899

Launch price

Released Dec 2025

Alpha 7 V is 10.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

GR II

Wins

10categories

Alpha 7 V

WildlifePortrait

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

GR II wins 1 categories·Alpha 7 V wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher RAW buffer depth (95 frames vs 10 frames)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AGR II has lower Weight (251 g vs 695 g)

Key specs at a glance

GR IIAlpha 7 V
Resolution16.2 MP33 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst4 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNo7.5-stop
Weight251 g695 g
Battery320 shots630 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR II

117 × 63 × 35 mm

251 g (0.55 lb / 8.85 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 V front view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 × 82 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

GR II is 13mm narrower, 34mm shorter, and 48mm thinner than Alpha 7 V.

GR II is 444 g lighter than Alpha 7 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 35mm GR II · 82mm Alpha 7 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

GR II

117 × 63 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V back view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

GR II

117 × 35 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V top view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

GR II

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

Alpha 7 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GR II: mount data unavailable

Alpha 7 V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IIAlpha 7 V
Portrait
2.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
0.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
0.0Limited
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
3.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 117, 62.8, 34.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    251 g vs 695 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 V

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A / SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    95 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR II

Pros

  • APS-C sensor
  • 28mm GR lens
  • Built-in flash
  • Great used value

Cons

  • Older 16MP sensor
  • No IBIS
  • Fixed lens

Alpha 7 V

Pros

  • 33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
  • Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
  • 7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
  • 759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
  • 7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
  • Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
  • Up to 16 stops dynamic range

Cons

  • Premium price vs α7 IV
  • 4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
  • Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
  • Complex menu and feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR II and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR II
Alpha 7 V
Resolution
16.2 MP
33 MP2× more
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame Exmor RS CMOS (partially stacked)
Sensor size
23.7 x 15.7 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
GR II
Alpha 7 V
Processor
GR ENGINE V
BIONZ XR2 + AI processing unit
GR II
Alpha 7 V
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
25,600
204,800
GR II
Alpha 7 V
Shutter type
Leaf shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec
GR II
Alpha 7 V
AF system
Contrast AF
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
759
AF frame coverage
94 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
Eye AF
No
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Face
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car, Train, Airplane

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, GR II or Alpha 7 V?

Alpha 7 V scores 10.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for GR II — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the GR II and Alpha 7 V?

GR II is 16.2 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR II and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?

GR II does not have IBIS, while alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR II or the Alpha 7 V?

GR II reaches 4 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR II and Alpha 7 V?

GR II weighs 251 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the GR II is 444 g lighter.

Do the GR II and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?

GR II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the GR II and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?

GR II: No. Alpha 7 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the GR II and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the Alpha 7 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR II launched at $799 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The GR II is $2,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh and Sony press materials.