Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Ricoh

GR II

Classic APS-C GR with 16.2MP sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, built-in flash, Wi-Fi, and snap-focus street ergonomics.

$799

Launch price

Released Jun 2015

vs
Alpha 7 V

Sony

Alpha 7 V

33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.

$2,899

Launch price

Released Dec 2025

Alpha 7 V is 10.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

GR II

Wins

10categories

Alpha 7 V

WildlifeSports & Action

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GR II wins 1 categories·Alpha 7 V wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher RAW buffer depth (95 frames vs 10 frames)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AGR II has lower Weight (251 g vs 695 g)

Key specs at a glance

GR IIAlpha 7 V
Resolution16.2 MP33 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst4 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNo7.5-stop
Weight251 g695 g
Battery320 shots630 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR II

117 × 63 × 35 mm

251 g (0.55 lb / 8.85 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 V front view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 × 82 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

GR II is 13mm narrower, 34mm shorter, and 48mm thinner than Alpha 7 V.

GR II is 444 g lighter than Alpha 7 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 35mm GR II · 82mm Alpha 7 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

GR II

117 × 63 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V back view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

GR II

117 × 35 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V top view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

GR II

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

Alpha 7 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GR II: mount data unavailable

Alpha 7 V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IIAlpha 7 V
Portrait
2.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
1.0Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
0.0Limited
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
3.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 117, 62.8, 34.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    251 g vs 695 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 V

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A / SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    95 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR II

Pros

  • APS-C sensor
  • 28mm GR lens
  • Built-in flash
  • Great used value

Cons

  • Older 16MP sensor
  • No IBIS
  • Fixed lens

Alpha 7 V

Pros

  • 33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
  • Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
  • 7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
  • 759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
  • 7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
  • Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
  • Up to 16 stops dynamic range

Cons

  • Premium price vs α7 IV
  • 4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
  • Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
  • Complex menu and feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR II and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR II
Alpha 7 V
Resolution
16.2 MP
33 MP2× more
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame Exmor RS CMOS (partially stacked)
Sensor size
23.7 x 15.7 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
GR II
Alpha 7 V
Aperture
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
GR II
Alpha 7 V
Processor
GR ENGINE V
BIONZ XR2 + AI processing unit
GR II
Alpha 7 V
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
25,600
204,800
GR II
Alpha 7 V
Shutter type
Leaf shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, GR II or Alpha 7 V?

Alpha 7 V scores 10.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for GR II — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the GR II and Alpha 7 V?

GR II is 16.2 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR II and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?

GR II does not have IBIS, while Alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR II or the Alpha 7 V?

GR II reaches 4 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR II and Alpha 7 V?

GR II weighs 251 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the GR II is 444 g lighter.

Do the GR II and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?

GR II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the GR II and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?

GR II: No. Alpha 7 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the GR II and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the Alpha 7 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR II launched at $799 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The GR II is $2,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GR II vs Alpha 7 V vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh and Sony press materials.