Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Ricoh

GR II

Classic APS-C GR with 16.2MP sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, built-in flash, Wi-Fi, and snap-focus street ergonomics.

$799

Released Jun 2015

vs
Alpha 1 II

Sony

Alpha 1 II

50MP stacked flagship with 30fps RAW, 8K video, and Sony's fastest hybrid performance.

$6,499

Released Nov 2024

Alpha 1 II is 9.4 years newer.

Wins

1categories

GR II

Wins

9categories

Alpha 1 II

Video & HybridWildlife

2 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

GR II wins 1 categories·Alpha 1 II wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 10 frames)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Resolution (50.1 MP vs 16.2 MP)
  • AGR II has lower Weight (251 g vs 743 g)

Key specs at a glance

GR IIAlpha 1 II
Resolution16.2 MP50.1 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max25,60032,000
Burst4 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight251 g743 g
Battery320 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR II

117 × 63 × 35 mm

251 g (0.55 lb / 8.85 oz)

Alpha 1 II front view

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 × 83 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

GR II is 19mm narrower, 34mm shorter, and 48mm thinner than Alpha 1 II.

GR II is 492 g lighter than Alpha 1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 35mm GR II · 83mm Alpha 1 II

Sensor size, to scale

GR II

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

Alpha 1 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GR II: mount data unavailable

Alpha 1 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IIAlpha 1 II
Portrait
2.5Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
0.5Limited
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
0.0Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
3.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 117, 62.8, 34.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    251 g vs 743 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 1 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    50.1 MP vs 16.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR II

Pros

  • APS-C sensor
  • 28mm GR lens
  • Built-in flash
  • Great used value

Cons

  • Older 16MP sensor
  • No IBIS
  • Fixed lens

Alpha 1 II

Pros

  • 50MP stacked sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free burst
  • 8K 30p video
  • Best Sony AF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Complex menus
  • Large files

Full specifications

= category winner

GR II
Alpha 1 II
Resolution
16.2 MP
50.1 MP3.1× more
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
23.7 x 15.7 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
GR II
Alpha 1 II
AF system
Contrast AF
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
759
AF frame coverage
94 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
Eye AF
No
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Face
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
GR II
Alpha 1 II
Burst (mechanical)
4 fps
10 fps2.5× more
Burst (electronic)
4 fps
30 fps7.5× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
Yes
RAW buffer depth
10 frames
200 frames20× more
GR II
Alpha 1 II
Max resolution
Full HD
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
GR II
Alpha 1 II
Weight
251 g−492 g less
743 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
117 × 62.8 × 34.7 mm
136.1 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
No
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, GR II or Alpha 1 II?

Alpha 1 II scores 9.5/10 versus 0.0/10 for GR II — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the GR II and Alpha 1 II?

GR II is 16.2 MP and Alpha 1 II is 50.1 MP, so the Alpha 1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR II and Alpha 1 II have in-body image stabilization?

GR II does not have IBIS, while alpha 1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR II or the Alpha 1 II?

GR II reaches 4 fps electronic. Alpha 1 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR II and Alpha 1 II?

GR II weighs 251 g and Alpha 1 II weighs 743 g, so the GR II is 492 g lighter.

Do the GR II and Alpha 1 II record 4K video?

GR II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 1 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the GR II and Alpha 1 II weather sealed?

GR II: No. Alpha 1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the GR II and 520 shots for the Alpha 1 II, giving the Alpha 1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR II launched at $799 and Alpha 1 II at $6,499. The GR II is $5,700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh and Sony press materials.