Ricoh
GR III
Street photography icon with 24.24MP APS-C, 28mm equivalent GR lens, 3-axis SR, and snap-focus in a pocket body.
$899
Released Mar 2019

Sony
Alpha 7R VI
66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.
$4,499
Released Jun 2026
Alpha 7R VI is 7.2 years newer.
Wins
GR III
Wins
Alpha 7R VI
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BAlpha 7R VI has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 49)
- BAlpha 7R VI has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
- AGR III has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 32,000)
- BAlpha 7R VI has higher Battery life (CIPA) (600 shots vs 200 shots)
- AGR III has lower Weight (257 g vs 713 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
GR III
109 × 62 × 33 mm
257 g (0.57 lb / 9.07 oz)

Alpha 7R VI
133 × 97 × 83 mm
713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)
GR III is 23mm narrower, 35mm shorter, and 50mm thinner than Alpha 7R VI.
GR III is 456 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.
Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR III · 83mm Alpha 7R VI
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
GR III
109 × 62 mm

Alpha 7R VI
133 × 97 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
GR III
109 × 33 mm

Alpha 7R VI
133 × 83 mm
Sensor size, to scale
GR III
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
Alpha 7R VI
35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame
862 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
GR III: mount data unavailable
Alpha 7R VI
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
GR III
Codecs
Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 109.4, 61.9, 33.2
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better
Weight
257 g vs 713 g — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds Face
Reasons to choose
Alpha 7R VI
Codecs
Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II
AF points / zones
759 vs 49 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Battery life (CIPA)
600 shots vs 200 shots — higher is better
Resolution
66.8 MP vs 24.24 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GR III
Pros
- ✓Pocketable APS-C
- ✓28mm equivalent GR lens
- ✓3-axis sensor-shift SR
- ✓Snap focus street shooting
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –No built-in EVF
- –Full HD video only
Alpha 7R VI
Pros
- ✓66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
- ✓30fps blackout-free electronic burst
- ✓8K 30p and 4K 120p video
- ✓8.5-stop in-body stabilization
- ✓9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF
Cons
- –Very expensive
- –Large files demand fast cards and storage
- –8K workflow can be heavy
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, GR III or Alpha 7R VI?
Alpha 7R VI scores 5.5/10 versus 0.5/10 for GR III — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the GR III and Alpha 7R VI?
GR III is 24.24 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the GR III and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?
GR III has in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the GR III or the Alpha 7R VI?
GR III reaches 4 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the GR III and Alpha 7R VI?
GR III weighs 257 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the GR III is 456 g lighter.
Do the GR III and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?
GR III: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.
Are the GR III and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?
GR III: No. Alpha 7R VI: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 200 shots (CIPA) for the GR III and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the Alpha 7R VI the edge.
How much does each cost?
GR III launched at $899 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The GR III is $3,600 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Ricoh and Sony press materials.