Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Released Jan 2026

vs

Sony

ZV-1 II

Creator compact with 18–50mm zoom, Product Showcase, and vlog-first controls.

$899

Released May 2023

GR IV is 2.6 years newer.

Wins

5categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

Wins

4categories

ZV-1 II

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

GR IV wins 2 categories·ZV-1 II wins 3 categories
  • AGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 12,800)
  • BZV-1 II has higher AF points / zones (315 vs 49)
  • BZV-1 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (24 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BZV-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (24 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AGR IV has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

GR IVZV-1 II
Resolution25.74 MP20.1 MP
SensorAPS-C13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max204,80012,800
Burst4 fps24 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBISYesNo
Weight262 g292 g
Battery250 shots290 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

ZV-1 II

106 × 60 × 47 mm

292 g (0.64 lb / 10.30 oz)

GR IV is 14mm thinner than ZV-1 II but it is also 4mm wider and 1mm taller.

GR IV is 30 g lighter than ZV-1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR IV · 47mm ZV-1 II

Sensor size, to scale

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

ZV-1 II

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″

116 mm² area

3.1× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IVZV-1 II
Portrait
6.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
0.5Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
3.5Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
1.0Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • In-body stabilization

    Only GR IV supports it

  • Resolution

    25.74 MP vs 20.1 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

ZV-1 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 105.5, 60, 46.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I, Memory Stick Duo

  • AF points / zones

    315 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    24 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    24 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only ZV-1 II supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

ZV-1 II

Pros

  • Built for vlogging
  • 18–50mm versatile zoom
  • Bokeh Switch

Cons

  • 1-inch sensor
  • Fixed lens
  • No EVF

Full specifications

= category winner

GR IV
ZV-1 II
Resolution
25.74 MP+28%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
1.0-type Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
23.3 x 15.5 mm
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
GR IV
ZV-1 II
AF system
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
49
3156.4× more
AF frame coverage
94 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Face, Eye
Human, Animal
GR IV
ZV-1 II
Burst (mechanical)
4 fps
24 fps6× more
Burst (electronic)
4 fps
24 fps6× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
GR IV
ZV-1 II
Max resolution
Full HD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
Standard profiles
Codecs
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
XAVC S, H.264
GR IV
ZV-1 II
Weight
262 g−30 g less
292 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
109.4 × 61.1 × 32.7 mm
105.5 × 60 × 46.7 mm
Weather sealing
No
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, GR IV or ZV-1 II?

GR IV scores 6.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for ZV-1 II — 25.74MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the GR IV and ZV-1 II?

GR IV is 25.74 MP and ZV-1 II is 20.1 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR IV and ZV-1 II have in-body image stabilization?

GR IV has in-body image stabilization, while zV-1 II does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR IV or the ZV-1 II?

GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic. ZV-1 II reaches 24 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR IV and ZV-1 II?

GR IV weighs 262 g and ZV-1 II weighs 292 g, so the GR IV is 30 g lighter.

Do the GR IV and ZV-1 II record 4K video?

GR IV: 4K up to 60p. ZV-1 II: 4K up to 30p.

Are the GR IV and ZV-1 II weather sealed?

GR IV: No. ZV-1 II: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 250 shots (CIPA) for the GR IV and 290 shots for the ZV-1 II, giving the ZV-1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR IV launched at $1,499 and ZV-1 II at $899. The ZV-1 II is $600 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.