Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
GR IV

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

vs

Z CAM

E2-M4

Compact MFT cinema box with 4K 120p, ZRAW, ProRes, and interchangeable MFT lenses.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jun 2023

GR IV is 2.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

3categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

Wins

6categories

E2-M4

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GR IV wins 2 categories·E2-M4 wins 3 categories
  • BE2-M4 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 25,600)
  • BE2-M4 has higher Burst (electronic) (15 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BE2-M4 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 250 shots)
  • AGR IV has higher Resolution (25.74 MP vs 10.28 MP)

Key specs at a glance

GR IVE2-M4
Resolution25.74 MP10.28 MP
SensorAPS-CMFT
ISO max204,80025,600
Burst4 fps15 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISYes6-stop
Weight262 g370 g
Battery250 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR IV front view

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

E2-M4

91 × 66 × 72 mm

370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)

GR IV is 5mm shorter and 39mm thinner than E2-M4 but it is also 18mm wider.

GR IV is 108 g lighter than E2-M4.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR IV · 72mm E2-M4

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

GR IV back view

GR IV

109 × 61 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

E2-M4

91 × 66 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

GR IV top view

GR IV

109 × 33 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

E2-M4

91 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

E2-M4

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

1.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GR IV: mount data unavailable

E2-M4

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IVE2-M4
Portrait
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
1.5Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
1.0Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    25.74 MP vs 10.28 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    262 g vs 370 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

E2-M4

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds ZRAW, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 91, 66, 72

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    15 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only E2-M4 supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

E2-M4

Pros

  • Tiny MFT cinema box
  • 4K 120p
  • ZRAW internal
  • Affordable cinema entry

Cons

  • No screen
  • MFT sensor
  • Manual focus workflow

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR IV and E2-M4 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR IV
E2-M4
Resolution
25.74 MP2.5× more
10.28 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Four Thirds CMOS
Sensor size
23.3 x 15.5 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
GR IV
E2-M4
Aperture
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
GR IV
E2-M4
Processor
GR ENGINE 7
Image processor
GR IV
E2-M4
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
204,800+3 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
GR IV
E2-M4
Shutter type
Leaf shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, GR IV or E2-M4?

E2-M4 scores 9.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for GR IV — 15fps burst — fast action ready.

What's the resolution difference between the GR IV and E2-M4?

GR IV is 25.74 MP and E2-M4 is 10.28 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR IV and E2-M4 have in-body image stabilization?

GR IV has in-body image stabilization, while E2-M4 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR IV or the E2-M4?

GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic. E2-M4 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR IV and E2-M4?

GR IV weighs 262 g and E2-M4 weighs 370 g, so the GR IV is 108 g lighter.

Do the GR IV and E2-M4 record 4K video?

GR IV: 4K up to 60p. E2-M4: 4K up to 120p.

Are the GR IV and E2-M4 weather sealed?

GR IV: No. E2-M4: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 250 shots (CIPA) for the GR IV and 640 shots for the E2-M4, giving the E2-M4 the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR IV launched at $1,499 and E2-M4 at $1,299. The E2-M4 is $200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GR IV vs E2-M4 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh and Z CAM press materials.