Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
FP2

Sigma

FP2

Pocket-sized L-Mount full-frame body with a 24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps stills, 6K OpenGate / ProRes RAW video, 70GB internal storage, and a Still/Cine mode switch.

$2,199

Launch price

Released Nov 2026

vs
FX5

Sony

FX5

2026 Cinema Line full-frame camera with 16.6MP stacked Exmor RS, 5K Open Gate, internal 16-bit X-OCN RAW, triple base ISO, and FX3-class compact mobility.

$4,899

Launch price

Released Aug 2026

FP2 is 3 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

FP2

★ Portrait★ Travel

Wins

5categories

FX5

★ Video & Hybrid★ Portrait

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

FP2 wins 3 categories·FX5 wins 2 categories
  • AFP2 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 0 fps)
  • BFX5 has higher IBIS effectiveness (5.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AFP2 has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 800)
  • AFP2 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • BFX5 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 59.94 fps)

Key specs at a glance

FP2FX5
Resolution24.5 MP16.6 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst20 fps—
4K59.94 fps120 fps
IBISNo5.5-stop
Weight460 g734 g
Battery370 shots—

Size and weight, to scale

FP2 front view

FP2

112 × 71 × 41 mm

460 g (1.01 lb / 16.23 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

FX5 front view

FX5

132 × 79 × 87 mm

734 g (1.62 lb / 25.89 oz)

FP2 is 20mm narrower, 8mm shorter, and 46mm thinner than FX5.

FP2 is 274 g lighter than FX5.

Depth (front-to-back): 41mm FP2 · 87mm FX5

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

FP2 back view

FP2

112 × 71 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

FX5 back view

FX5

132 × 79 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

FP2 top view

FP2

112 × 41 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

FX5 top view

FX5

132 × 87 mm

Sensor size, to scale

FP2

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

FX5

35.7 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

850 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

FP2: mount data unavailable

FX5

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseFP2FX5
Portrait
6.5Good
6.5Good
Sports & Action
4.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
5.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Vlogging
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

FP2

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animals, Birds, People

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112, 71, 41

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 800 — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes RAW, ProRes RAW HQ

  • Weight

    460 g vs 734 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

FX5

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird

  • IBIS effectiveness

    5.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.3, 79, 86.95

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • Codecs

    Adds X-OCN LT, X-OCN C1, X-OCN C2…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    240 fps vs 119.88 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
  • ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
  • ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
  • ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
  • ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
  • ✓Microphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

FP2

Pros

  • ✓World's smallest full-frame body (376g body only)
  • ✓24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps electronic burst
  • ✓6K OpenGate + ProRes RAW HQ, L-Log, 32-bit float audio
  • ✓70GB internal storage + SD UHS-II + USB SSD
  • ✓Tilting 3.15" LCD, dust/splash resistant, modular EVF-21

Cons

  • –No in-body image stabilization (EIS in video only)
  • –No built-in EVF — optional EVF-21 sold separately
  • –Electronic shutter only
  • –No headphone jack (USB audio only)

FX5

Pros

  • ✓5K Open Gate + internal X-OCN RAW (LT / C1 / C2)
  • ✓Triple base ISO 800 / 4000 / 12800 + Dual Gain
  • ✓15+ stops DR (S-Log3) + BIONZ XR2 AI AF
  • ✓5K 60p / 4K 120p / FHD 240p at launch
  • ✓Compact body with IBIS, cooling, dual card slots

Cons

  • –Body-only $4,899 — XLR handle / OLED EVF optional
  • –Open Gate X-OCN only at launch (XAVC Open Gate via FW)
  • –4K 240p / 5K 120p planned for 2027 firmware
  • –No built-in EVF (optional DVF-EL1)

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the FP2 and FX5 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

✓ = category winner

FP2
FX5
Resolution
24.5 MP✓+48%
16.6 MP
Sensor type
Partially Stacked CMOS
Full Frame fully-stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 x 23.9
35.7 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
FP2
FX5
Processor
Sigma image processor
BIONZ XR2 with integrated AI processing unit
FP2
FX5
ISO min (native)
100✓−700 less
800
ISO max (native)
102,400✓+3 stops
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
409,600
FP2
FX5
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
—
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/25600 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, FP2 or FX5?

FX5 scores 8.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for FP2 — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the FP2 and FX5?

FP2 is 24.5 MP and FX5 is 16.6 MP, so the FP2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the FP2 and FX5 have in-body image stabilization?

FP2 does not have IBIS, while FX5 has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

What's the weight difference between the FP2 and FX5?

FP2 weighs 460 g and FX5 weighs 734 g, so the FP2 is 274 g lighter.

Do the FP2 and FX5 record 4K video?

FP2: 4K up to 59.94p. FX5: 4K up to 120p.

Are the FP2 and FX5 weather sealed?

FP2: Yes. FX5: Yes.

How much does each cost?

FP2 launched at $2,199 and FX5 at $4,899. The FP2 is $2,700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way FP2 vs FX5 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.

Product images courtesy of Sigma and Sony press materials.