Sigma
FP2
Pocket-sized L-Mount full-frame body with a 24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps stills, 6K OpenGate / ProRes RAW video, 70GB internal storage, and a Still/Cine mode switch.
$2,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2026
Z CAM
E2-M4
Compact MFT cinema box with 4K 120p, ZRAW, ProRes, and interchangeable MFT lenses.
$1,299
Launch priceReleased Jun 2023
FP2 is 3.4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
FP2
Wins
E2-M4
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BE2-M4 has higher Burst (mechanical) (6 fps vs 0 fps)
- BE2-M4 has higher IBIS effectiveness (6 stops vs 0 stops)
- AFP2 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AFP2 has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
- AFP2 has higher Resolution (24.5 MP vs 10.28 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
FP2
112 × 71 × 41 mm
460 g (1.01 lb / 16.23 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
E2-M4
91 × 66 × 72 mm
370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)
FP2 is 31mm thinner than E2-M4 but it is also 21mm wider and 5mm taller.
FP2 is 90 g heavier than E2-M4.
Depth (front-to-back): 41mm FP2 · 72mm E2-M4
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
FP2
112 × 71 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
E2-M4
91 × 66 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
FP2
112 × 41 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
E2-M4
91 × 72 mm
Sensor size, to scale
FP2
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
E2-M4
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
FP2: mount data unavailable
E2-M4
✓ more lensesMicro Four Thirds
130+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
FP2
Subject recognition
Adds Animals, Birds, People
Codecs
Adds ProRes RAW, ProRes RAW HQ, H.264…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 112, 71, 41
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Resolution
24.5 MP vs 10.28 MP — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
20 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
E2-M4
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds ZRAW, ProRes
IBIS effectiveness
6 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 91, 66, 72
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
FP2
Pros
- ✓World's smallest full-frame body (376g body only)
- ✓24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps electronic burst
- ✓6K OpenGate + ProRes RAW HQ, L-Log, 32-bit float audio
- ✓70GB internal storage + SD UHS-II + USB SSD
- ✓Tilting 3.15" LCD, dust/splash resistant, modular EVF-21
Cons
- –No in-body image stabilization (EIS in video only)
- –No built-in EVF — optional EVF-21 sold separately
- –Electronic shutter only
- –No headphone jack (USB audio only)
E2-M4
Pros
- ✓Tiny MFT cinema box
- ✓4K 120p
- ✓ZRAW internal
- ✓Affordable cinema entry
Cons
- –No screen
- –MFT sensor
- –Manual focus workflow
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the FP2 and E2-M4 at major authorized retailers.
Z CAM E2-M4
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, FP2 or E2-M4?
E2-M4 scores 9.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for FP2 — 15fps burst — fast action ready.
What's the resolution difference between the FP2 and E2-M4?
FP2 is 24.5 MP and E2-M4 is 10.28 MP, so the FP2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the FP2 and E2-M4 have in-body image stabilization?
FP2 does not have IBIS, while E2-M4 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the FP2 or the E2-M4?
FP2 reaches 20 fps electronic. E2-M4 reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the FP2 and E2-M4?
FP2 weighs 460 g and E2-M4 weighs 370 g, so the E2-M4 is 90 g lighter.
Do the FP2 and E2-M4 record 4K video?
FP2: 4K up to 59.94p. E2-M4: 4K up to 120p.
Are the FP2 and E2-M4 weather sealed?
FP2: Yes. E2-M4: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 370 shots (CIPA) for the FP2 and 640 shots for the E2-M4, giving the E2-M4 the edge.
How much does each cost?
FP2 launched at $2,199 and E2-M4 at $1,299. The E2-M4 is $900 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way FP2 vs E2-M4 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.
Product images courtesy of Sigma and Z CAM press materials.