Canon
RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
A compact, lightweight ultra-wide zoom with 5.5-stop IS — ideal for vloggers, travelers, and landscape photographers.
$1,699
Launch priceReleased Aug 2022
Tamron
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Sony E Mount
An incredibly popular third-party zoom updated with vastly improved sharpness and autofocus.
$899
Launch priceReleased Aug 2021
RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM is 1.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM
Wins
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- ARF 14-35mm F4L IS USM has higher OIS effectiveness (5.5 stops vs 0 stops)
- B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Min focus distance (18 cm vs 20 cm)
- B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Diameter (76 mm vs 84 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 4 Aspherical, 2 UD
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Length
112 mm vs 118 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.38 × vs 0.37 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 LD, 2 GM
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
18 cm vs 20 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
76 mm vs 84 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weight
Both 540 g
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Extremely compact for an ultra-wide zoom (540g)
- ✓14mm ultra-wide perspective for dramatic scenes
- ✓5.5-stop optical image stabilization
- ✓Center sharpness excellent across range
Cons
- –f/4 maximum aperture limits low-light use
- –More expensive than EF 16-35mm f/4 IS
- –Corner sharpness falls off at 14mm
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Pros
- ✓Superb value for money compared to first-party options
- ✓Excellent sharpness throughout the range, even at f/2.8
- ✓Very lightweight and compact (only 540g)
- ✓Fast VXD linear motor focus drive
- ✓Customizable lens functions via Tamron Lens Utility software
Cons
- –Starts at 28mm instead of the wider 24mm standard
- –Slightly weaker corner sharpness at 75mm wide open
- –Weather sealing is basic compared to Sony GM lenses
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM and 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.