Canon
RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
A compact, lightweight ultra-wide zoom with 5.5-stop IS — ideal for vloggers, travelers, and landscape photographers.
$1,699
Launch priceReleased Aug 2022
Canon
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
An incredibly compact, extending telephoto zoom with L-series optics and 5 stops of stabilization.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2019
RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM is 2.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM
Wins
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
TL;DR — Key differences
- ARF 14-35mm F4L IS USM has lower Min focus distance (20 cm vs 70 cm)
- ARF 14-35mm F4L IS USM has lower Weight (540 g vs 1070 g)
- ARF 14-35mm F4L IS USM has higher Max magnification (0.38 × vs 0.23 ×)
- BRF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BRF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 4 Aspherical, 2 UD
- ✓
Min focus distance
20 cm vs 70 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Internal focus
Only RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Weight
540 g vs 1070 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
112 mm vs 146 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.38 × vs 0.23 × — higher is better
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5.5 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
84 mm vs 90 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Super UD, 1 UD, 2 Aspherical
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
Shared specifications
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Extremely compact for an ultra-wide zoom (540g)
- ✓14mm ultra-wide perspective for dramatic scenes
- ✓5.5-stop optical image stabilization
- ✓Center sharpness excellent across range
Cons
- –f/4 maximum aperture limits low-light use
- –More expensive than EF 16-35mm f/4 IS
- –Corner sharpness falls off at 14mm
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Unbelievably compact storage size thanks to extending barrel
- ✓Very lightweight design (only 1070g)
- ✓Excellent center sharpness at all focal lengths
- ✓Dual Nano USM focus motors offer fast, silent AF
- ✓Exceptional 5-stop optical image stabilization
Cons
- –Extending barrel can draw in dust/moisture over time
- –Not compatible with RF teleconverters (due to rear element position)
- –Vignetting is quite heavy wide open
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM and RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM
Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.