Canon
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
An incredibly compact, extending telephoto zoom with L-series optics and 5 stops of stabilization.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2019
Canon
RF 85mm F1.2L USM
Canon RF Mount
The definitive portrait prime for RF — f/1.2 aperture delivers unmatched subject separation and dreamy backgrounds.
$2,699
Launch priceReleased Feb 2019
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM is 8 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Wins
RF 85mm F1.2L USM
TL;DR — Key differences
- ARF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BRF 85mm F1.2L USM has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- BRF 85mm F1.2L USM has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- ARF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM has higher Max magnification (0.23 × vs 0.12 ×)
- BRF 85mm F1.2L USM has lower Length (117 mm vs 146 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
The verdict
Separated by only $100, the most decisive difference is the choice between the versatility of a 70-200mm focal range and the extreme f/1.2 maximum aperture.
Choose the Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM if you require reach and stability for handheld shooting, as it offers a 5-stop optical image stabilizer. This lens provides the necessary flexibility for dynamic environments where a fixed focal length is too restrictive.
Choose the Canon RF 85mm F1.2L USM if your priority is low-light performance and shallow depth of field, driven by its significantly wider f/1.2 maximum aperture. This prime lens is the definitive choice for portraiture where maximum light gathering is the primary requirement.
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Super UD, 2 Aspherical
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
70 cm vs 85 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
90 mm vs 103 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.23 × vs 0.12 × — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
1070 g vs 1195 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose the RF 85mm F1.2L USM
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical
- ✓
Internal focus
Only RF 85mm F1.2L USM supports it
- ✓
Length
117 mm vs 146 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Unbelievably compact storage size thanks to extending barrel
- ✓Very lightweight design (only 1070g)
- ✓Excellent center sharpness at all focal lengths
- ✓Dual Nano USM focus motors offer fast, silent AF
- ✓Exceptional 5-stop optical image stabilization
Cons
- –Extending barrel can draw in dust/moisture over time
- –Not compatible with RF teleconverters (due to rear element position)
- –Vignetting is quite heavy wide open
RF 85mm F1.2L USM
Pros
- ✓Class-leading portrait focal length with f/1.2 aperture
- ✓Exceptional subject isolation and bokeh quality
- ✓Excellent eye-AF tracking on Canon R bodies
- ✓Premium L-series weather sealing
Cons
- –Very heavy (1195g) — tiring for handheld sessions
- –Expensive flagship pricing
- –No built-in stabilization
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM and RF 85mm F1.2L USM at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF 85mm F1.2L USM
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.