Canon
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
The cornerstone zoom for Canon mirrorless, featuring 5 stops of optical image stabilization.
$2,399
Launch priceReleased Aug 2019
Canon
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
An incredibly compact, extending telephoto zoom with L-series optics and 5 stops of stabilization.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2019
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM is 2 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Wins
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
3 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- ARF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Min focus distance (21 cm vs 70 cm)
- ARF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has higher Max magnification (0.3 × vs 0.23 ×)
- ARF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Weight (900 g vs 1070 g)
- ARF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Length (125 mm vs 146 mm)
- ARF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Diameter (88 mm vs 90 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
The verdict
The $400 price gap between these professional zooms represents a choice between the versatile 24-70mm standard range and the 70-200mm telephoto reach.
Choose the Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM if you require a lighter 900g lens with a close 21cm minimum focus distance. Its internal focusing and 0.3x magnification facilitate general-purpose shooting and close-up detail.
Choose the Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM if your priority is long-range reach and the Dual Nano USM motor system. This lens extends focal length to 200mm while maintaining a constant f/2.8 aperture and 5-stop optical stabilization.
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Aspherical, 3 UD
- ✓
Min focus distance
21 cm vs 70 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Internal focus
Only RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Weight
900 g vs 1070 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
125 mm vs 146 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.3 × vs 0.23 × — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
88 mm vs 90 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Super UD, 1 UD, 2 Aspherical
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
OIS effectiveness
Both 5 stops
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization (up to 5 stops)
- ✓Excellent L-series sharpness and build quality
- ✓Fast and silent Nano USM focus motor
- ✓Very low chromatic aberration
Cons
- –Heavier than competitive options (900g)
- –Pricey entry threshold
- –Minor barrel distortion at 24mm
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Unbelievably compact storage size thanks to extending barrel
- ✓Very lightweight design (only 1070g)
- ✓Excellent center sharpness at all focal lengths
- ✓Dual Nano USM focus motors offer fast, silent AF
- ✓Exceptional 5-stop optical image stabilization
Cons
- –Extending barrel can draw in dust/moisture over time
- –Not compatible with RF teleconverters (due to rear element position)
- –Vignetting is quite heavy wide open
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM and RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.