Canon
RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
The ultimate walk-around RF zoom — covers wide to portrait with 5-stop IS in a single versatile package.
$1,099
Launch priceReleased Oct 2018
Canon
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
The cornerstone zoom for Canon mirrorless, featuring 5 stops of optical image stabilization.
$2,399
Launch priceReleased Aug 2019
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM is 10 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
Wins
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BRF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Min focus distance (21 cm vs 45 cm)
- BRF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BRF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- ARF 24-105mm F4L IS USM has lower Weight (700 g vs 900 g)
- BRF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM has higher Max magnification (0.3 × vs 0.24 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
The verdict
The $1300 price gap between these lenses centers on the choice between a constant f/2.8 aperture for low light and the extended 105mm focal range.
Choose Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM if you prioritize reach and value for travel or outdoor shooting. Its 105mm maximum focal length provides more coverage in a single lens for $1099.
Choose Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM if you require increased light gathering and close-up capability for professional work. This lens offers a constant f/2.8 aperture and a 21cm minimum focus distance for $2399.
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 UD, 1 Aspherical
- ✓
Weight
700 g vs 900 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
107 mm vs 125 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
84 mm vs 88 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Aspherical, 3 UD
- ✓
Min focus distance
21 cm vs 45 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.3 × vs 0.24 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
OIS effectiveness
Both 5 stops
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Extremely versatile 24-105mm range for travel and events
- ✓5-stop optical image stabilization
- ✓Constant f/4 aperture throughout zoom
- ✓Nano USM delivers fast, quiet autofocus
Cons
- –f/4 maximum aperture limits low-light capability
- –Heavier than f/2.8 alternatives (700g)
- –Corner sharpness softens at 105mm wide open
RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization (up to 5 stops)
- ✓Excellent L-series sharpness and build quality
- ✓Fast and silent Nano USM focus motor
- ✓Very low chromatic aberration
Cons
- –Heavier than competitive options (900g)
- –Pricey entry threshold
- –Minor barrel distortion at 24mm
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM and RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.