Canon
RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
The ultimate walk-around RF zoom — covers wide to portrait with 5-stop IS in a single versatile package.
$1,099
Launch priceReleased Oct 2018
Canon
RF 35mm F1.2 L USM
Canon RF Mount
RF 35mm F1.2 L USM — 35mm f/1.2 for Canon RF, a popular choice in the canon lineup.
$2,999
Launch priceReleased Dec 2018
RF 35mm F1.2 L USM is 2 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
Wins
RF 35mm F1.2 L USM
TL;DR — Key differences
- ARF 24-105mm F4L IS USM has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BRF 35mm F1.2 L USM has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/4)
- BRF 35mm F1.2 L USM has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/4)
- ARF 24-105mm F4L IS USM has higher Max magnification (0.24 × vs 0.17 ×)
- ARF 24-105mm F4L IS USM has lower Weight (700 g vs 950 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
⌀84 × 107 mm
700 g (1.54 lb / 24.69 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
RF 35mm F1.2 L USM
⌀89 × 112 mm
950 g (2.09 lb / 33.51 oz)
RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM is 5mm shorter and 5mm narrower than RF 35mm F1.2 L USM.
RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM is 250 g lighter than RF 35mm F1.2 L USM.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Weight
700 g vs 950 g — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
45 cm vs 50 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.24 × vs 0.17 × — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
84 mm vs 89 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
107 mm vs 111.5 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the RF 35mm F1.2 L USM
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Aspherical
- ✓
Custom function button
Only RF 35mm F1.2 L USM supports it
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Extremely versatile 24-105mm range for travel and events
- ✓5-stop optical image stabilization
- ✓Constant f/4 aperture throughout zoom
- ✓Nano USM delivers fast, quiet autofocus
Cons
- –f/4 maximum aperture limits low-light capability
- –Heavier than f/2.8 alternatives (700g)
- –Corner sharpness softens at 105mm wide open
RF 35mm F1.2 L USM
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM and RF 35mm F1.2 L USM at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM
Canon RF 35mm F1.2 L USM
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.