Fujifilm
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR — 10–24mm f/4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$999
Launch priceReleased Oct 2020
Fujifilm
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II
Fujifilm X Mount
Second-gen flagship standard zoom — 410g, 72mm filter, de-clickable aperture, and 40MP-class resolution.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Jan 2025
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II is 4.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Wins
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II has higher Max magnification (0.21 × vs 0.16 ×)
- AXF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Min focus distance (24 cm vs 30 cm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
⌀78 × 87 mm
385 g (0.85 lb / 13.58 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II
⌀78 × 95 mm
410 g (0.90 lb / 14.46 oz)
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR is 8mm shorter and 1mm narrower than XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II.
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR is 25 g lighter than XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
24 cm vs 30 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
87 mm vs 95 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
385 g vs 410 g — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
77.6 mm vs 78.3 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 4 Aspherical, 3 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.21 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II
Pros
- ✓37% lighter than Mk I (410g vs 655g)
- ✓De-clickable aperture ring for video
- ✓0.3m close focus across zoom range
Cons
- –No optical IS — relies on body IBIS
- –Premium price for APS-C
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR and XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed August 2026.