Fujifilm
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR — 10–24mm f/4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$999
Launch priceReleased Oct 2020
Sony
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Sony E Mount
The standard telephoto zoom, completely redesigned to be 29% lighter and significantly sharper.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2021
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II is 1 year newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Wins
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Weight (385 g vs 1045 g)
- AXF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Length (87 mm vs 200 mm)
- BFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has higher Max magnification (0.3 × vs 0.16 ×)
- AXF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Min focus distance (24 cm vs 40 cm)
- BFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
⌀78 × 87 mm
385 g (0.85 lb / 13.58 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
⌀88 × 200 mm
1045 g (2.30 lb / 36.86 oz)
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR is 113mm shorter and 10mm narrower than FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II.
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR is 660 g lighter than FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Weight
385 g vs 1045 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
87 mm vs 200 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Control ring
Only XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
24 cm vs 40 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
77.6 mm vs 88 mm — lower is better
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 4.5 stops — higher is better
Reasons to choose the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 XA, 1 Aspherical, 1 Super ED…
- ✓
Custom function button
Only FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.3 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Pros
- ✓Extremely lightweight for an f/2.8 telephoto zoom (only 1045g)
- ✓Virtually instantaneous and silent autofocus with 4 XD Linear motors
- ✓Stunning optical performance and contrast across entire range
- ✓Outstanding built-in Optical SteadyShot stabilization
- ✓Dedicated physical aperture ring with click and lock switches
Cons
- –Very high price tag
- –Lens hood is bulky and can block storage space easily
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR and FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.