Fujifilm
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR — 16–80mm f/4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$799
Launch priceReleased Jul 2019
Fujifilm
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR — 50–140mm f/2.8 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,599
Launch priceReleased Jun 2014
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR is 5.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
Wins
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
3 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Weight (440 g vs 995 g)
- AXF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Length (112 mm vs 189 mm)
- BXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- AXF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Diameter (65 mm vs 70 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
- ✓
Weight
440 g vs 995 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
112 mm vs 189 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
65 mm vs 70 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Control ring
Only XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
Shared specifications
Min focus distance
Both 38 cm
Max magnification
Both 0.25 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
OIS effectiveness
Both 5 stops
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Native Fujifilm X mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR and XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.