Fujifilm
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR — 50–140mm f/2.8 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,599
Launch priceReleased Jun 2014
Fujifilm
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
762mm-equiv. super-telephoto at only 1335g with 5.5-stop OIS and linear AF.
$3,699
Launch priceReleased Oct 2024
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 10.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Wins
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR has lower Min focus distance (38 cm vs 275 cm)
- AXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/5.6)
- AXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/5.6)
- AXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR has lower Diameter (70 mm vs 104.5 mm)
- AXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR has lower Length (189 mm vs 255.5 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
⌀70 × 189 mm
995 g (2.19 lb / 35.10 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀105 × 256 mm
1335 g (2.94 lb / 47.09 oz)
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR is 67mm shorter and 35mm narrower than XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR.
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR is 340 g lighter than XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Min focus distance
38 cm vs 275 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 104.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
189 mm vs 255.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
995 g vs 1335 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.2 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 5 ED, 2 Super ED
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5.5 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR and XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.