Fujifilm
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
762mm-equiv. super-telephoto at only 1335g with 5.5-stop OIS and linear AF.
$3,699
Launch priceReleased Oct 2024
Fujifilm
XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR — 70–300mm f/4-5.6 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$799
Launch priceReleased Mar 2021
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 3.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Wins
XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BXF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Min focus distance (38 cm vs 275 cm)
- BXF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Weight (580 g vs 1335 g)
- BXF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Length (131 mm vs 255.5 mm)
- BXF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Diameter (70 mm vs 104.5 mm)
- BXF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/4 vs f/5.6)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀105 × 256 mm
1335 g (2.94 lb / 47.09 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀70 × 131 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 125mm longer and 35mm wider than XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR.
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 755 g heavier than XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 5 ED, 2 Super ED
- ✓
Control ring
Only XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5.5 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better
Reasons to choose the XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Min focus distance
38 cm vs 275 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
580 g vs 1335 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
131 mm vs 255.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 104.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/4 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.2 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/5.6
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Native Fujifilm X mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR and XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.