Fujifilm
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro — 60mm f/2.4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$649
Launch priceReleased Jan 2012
Sigma
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Sony E Mount
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art — 105mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sigma lineup.
$799
Launch priceReleased Jun 2021
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art is 9.4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
Wins
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Weight (215 g vs 710 g)
- AXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Length (80 mm vs 135.6 mm)
- AXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.4 vs f/2.8)
- AXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.4 vs f/2.8)
- AXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Diameter (70 mm vs 74 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
⌀70 × 80 mm
215 g (0.47 lb / 7.58 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
⌀74 × 136 mm
710 g (1.57 lb / 25.04 oz)
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro is 56mm shorter and 4mm narrower than 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art.
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro is 495 g lighter than 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
- ✓
Weight
215 g vs 710 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
80 mm vs 135.6 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 74 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art supports it
Shared specifications
Min focus distance
Both 28 cm
Max magnification
Both 1 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Fujifilm X mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Pros
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro and 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.