Nikon
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S — 105mm f/2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$999
Launch priceReleased Jun 2021
Tamron
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
Nikon Z Mount
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD — 35–150mm f/2-2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the tamron lineup.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Sep 2023
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD is 2.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
Wins
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- ANIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- ANIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.25 ×)
- ANIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S has lower Weight (630 g vs 1190 g)
- ANIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S has lower Length (138 mm vs 217 mm)
- B35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2 vs f/2.8)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.25 × — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
- ✓
Weight
630 g vs 1190 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
138 mm vs 217 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
28 cm vs 38 cm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Nikon Z mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Nikon Z mount compatibility
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S and 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD at major authorized retailers.
Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.