Nikon
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S — 105mm f/2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$999
Launch priceReleased Jun 2021
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Micro Four Thirds Mount
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro — 60mm f/2.8 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.
$549
Launch priceReleased Aug 2019
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S is 1.9 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ANIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Weight (185 g vs 630 g)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Length (82 mm vs 138 mm)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Min focus distance (19 cm vs 28 cm)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Diameter (60 mm vs 81 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareNIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
⌀81 × 138 mm
630 g (1.39 lb / 22.22 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
⌀60 × 82 mm
185 g (0.41 lb / 6.53 oz)
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S is 56mm longer and 21mm wider than M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro.
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S is 445 g heavier than M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Weight
185 g vs 630 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
82 mm vs 138 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
19 cm vs 28 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
60 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Max magnification
Both 1 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Nikon Z mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S and M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro at major authorized retailers.
Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.