OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro
Micro Four Thirds Mount
M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro — 30mm f/3.5 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.
$549
Launch priceReleased Jun 2020
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Micro Four Thirds Mount
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro — 60mm f/2.8 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.
$549
Launch priceReleased Aug 2019
M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro is 10 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro has lower Min focus distance (9.5 cm vs 19 cm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro has lower Weight (128 g vs 185 g)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro has lower Length (60 mm vs 82 mm)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareM.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro
⌀56 × 60 mm
128 g (0.28 lb / 4.52 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
⌀60 × 82 mm
185 g (0.41 lb / 6.53 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro is 22mm shorter and 4mm narrower than M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro is 57 g lighter than M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro
- ✓
Min focus distance
9.5 cm vs 19 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
128 g vs 185 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
60 mm vs 82 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
1.25 × vs 1 × — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
56 mm vs 60 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Super ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/3.5 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/3.5 — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro and M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm F3.5 Macro
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.