Nikon
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 — 35mm f/1.4 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$677
Launch priceReleased Jan 2025
Sony
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Sony E Mount
World's lightest 300mm F2.8 — 1470g with XD Linear AF, OSS, and G Master resolution.
$6,999
Launch priceReleased Jan 2024
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 is 11 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
Wins
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- ANIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 has lower Min focus distance (27 cm vs 200 cm)
- ANIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 has lower Weight (415 g vs 1470 g)
- ANIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 has lower Length (88.5 mm vs 264 mm)
- ANIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
⌀75 × 89 mm
415 g (0.91 lb / 14.64 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
⌀124 × 264 mm
1470 g (3.24 lb / 51.85 oz)
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 is 176mm shorter and 50mm narrower than FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS.
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 is 1055 g lighter than FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical, ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
27 cm vs 200 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
415 g vs 1470 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
88.5 mm vs 264 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
74.5 mm vs 124 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.18 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Super ED, 1 ED
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS supports it
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 and FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS at major authorized retailers.
Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
Sony FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.