Nikon
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — 70–200mm f/2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$2,599
Launch priceReleased Oct 2020
Panasonic
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Leica L Mount
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 — 16–35mm f/4 for Leica L, a popular choice in the panasonic lineup.
$1,299
Launch priceReleased Jan 2023
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 is 2.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Wins
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ANIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BLUMIX S 16-35mm F4 has lower Weight (493 g vs 1360 g)
- BLUMIX S 16-35mm F4 has lower Length (105.4 mm vs 240 mm)
- BLUMIX S 16-35mm F4 has lower Min focus distance (25 cm vs 38 cm)
- ANIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareNIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
⌀81 × 240 mm
1360 g (3.00 lb / 47.97 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
⌀74 × 105 mm
493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is 135mm longer and 7mm wider than LUMIX S 16-35mm F4.
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is 867 g heavier than LUMIX S 16-35mm F4.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
Reasons to choose the LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 1 ED
- ✓
Weight
493 g vs 1360 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
105.4 mm vs 240 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
25 cm vs 38 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
73.6 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max magnification
Both 0.25 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 at major authorized retailers.
Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Panasonic LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.