Panasonic
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Leica L Mount
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 — 16–35mm f/4 for Leica L, a popular choice in the panasonic lineup.
$1,299
Launch priceReleased Jan 2023
Sony
FE 50mm F1.2 GM
Sony E Mount
Exquisite resolution and dreamy bokeh combine in a masterful f/1.2 prime.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Mar 2021
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 is 1.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Wins
FE 50mm F1.2 GM
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 50mm F1.2 GM has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/4)
- BFE 50mm F1.2 GM has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/4)
- ALUMIX S 16-35mm F4 has lower Min focus distance (25 cm vs 40 cm)
- ALUMIX S 16-35mm F4 has lower Weight (493 g vs 778 g)
- ALUMIX S 16-35mm F4 has higher Max magnification (0.25 × vs 0.17 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
⌀74 × 105 mm
493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 50mm F1.2 GM
⌀87 × 108 mm
778 g (1.72 lb / 27.44 oz)
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 is 3mm shorter and 13mm narrower than FE 50mm F1.2 GM.
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 is 285 g lighter than FE 50mm F1.2 GM.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 1 ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
25 cm vs 40 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
493 g vs 778 g — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
73.6 mm vs 87 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.17 × — higher is better
- ✓
Length
105.4 mm vs 108 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 50mm F1.2 GM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 XA (extreme aspherical)
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/4 — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 50mm F1.2 GM
Pros
- ✓Outstanding sharpness wide open at f/1.2
- ✓Stunningly smooth, circular bokeh with 11 aperture blades
- ✓Extremely quiet and fast autofocus tracking
- ✓Manageable size and weight for an f/1.2 lens
Cons
- –Expensive investment for a single focal length
- –Heavy compared to standard f/1.8 options
- –Some visible vignetting wide open
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 and FE 50mm F1.2 GM at major authorized retailers.
Panasonic LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Sony FE 50mm F1.2 GM
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.