Nikon
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — 70–200mm f/2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$2,599
Launch priceReleased Oct 2020
Panasonic
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
Leica L Mount
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 — 24–70mm f/2.8 for Leica L, a popular choice in the panasonic lineup.
$2,199
Launch priceReleased Oct 2019
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is 1 year newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Wins
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ANIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BLUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 has lower Length (140 mm vs 240 mm)
- BLUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 has lower Weight (935 g vs 1360 g)
- ANIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has lower Diameter (81 mm vs 90.9 mm)
- BLUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 has lower Min focus distance (37 cm vs 38 cm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareNIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
⌀81 × 240 mm
1360 g (3.00 lb / 47.97 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
⌀91 × 140 mm
935 g (2.06 lb / 32.98 oz)
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is 100mm longer and 10mm narrower than LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8.
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is 425 g heavier than LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
- ✓
Diameter
81 mm vs 90.9 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
- ✓
Length
140 mm vs 240 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
935 g vs 1360 g — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
37 cm vs 38 cm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Max magnification
Both 0.25 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 at major authorized retailers.
Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Panasonic LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.