Panasonic
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
Leica L Mount
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. — 24–105mm f/4 for Leica L, a popular choice in the panasonic lineup.
$1,299
Launch priceReleased Oct 2019
Panasonic
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
Leica L Mount
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 — 24–70mm f/2.8 for Leica L, a popular choice in the panasonic lineup.
$2,199
Launch priceReleased Oct 2019
Released within a month of each other.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
Wins
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ALUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- ALUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.25 ×)
- BLUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BLUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- ALUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. has lower Min focus distance (28 cm vs 37 cm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareLUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
⌀70 × 159 mm
780 g (1.72 lb / 27.51 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
⌀91 × 140 mm
935 g (2.06 lb / 32.98 oz)
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. is 19mm longer and 21mm narrower than LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8.
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. is 155 g lighter than LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.25 × — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
28 cm vs 37 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 90.9 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
780 g vs 935 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose the LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
140 mm vs 159 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. and LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 at major authorized retailers.
Panasonic LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
Panasonic LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.