Panasonic
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
Leica L Mount
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. — 24–105mm f/4 for Leica L, a popular choice in the panasonic lineup.
$1,299
Launch priceReleased Oct 2019
Tamron
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Leica L Mount
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 — 28–75mm f/2.8 for Leica L, a popular choice in the tamron lineup.
$899
Launch priceReleased Feb 2023
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 is 3.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
Wins
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
TL;DR — Key differences
- ALUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- ALUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.32 ×)
- B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Min focus distance (18 cm vs 28 cm)
- B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
⌀70 × 159 mm
780 g (1.72 lb / 27.51 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
⌀80 × 118 mm
550 g (1.21 lb / 19.40 oz)
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. is 41mm longer and 10mm narrower than 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2.
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. is 230 g heavier than 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.32 × — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. supports it
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 79.6 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 XLD, 2 LD, 3 GM Aspherical
- ✓
Min focus distance
18 cm vs 28 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
550 g vs 780 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
117.8 mm vs 159 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S. and 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 at major authorized retailers.
Panasonic LUMIX S 24-105mm F4 Macro O.I.S.
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.