Nikon
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — 70–200mm f/2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$2,599
Launch priceReleased Oct 2020
Viltrox
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
Nikon Z Mount
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z — 28–75mm f/2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the viltrox lineup.
$699
Launch priceReleased Apr 2023
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z is 2.5 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Wins
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ANIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z has lower Weight (550 g vs 1360 g)
- BAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z has lower Length (117 mm vs 240 mm)
- BAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z has lower Diameter (75 mm vs 81 mm)
- BAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z has higher Max magnification (0.26 × vs 0.25 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareNIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
⌀81 × 240 mm
1360 g (3.00 lb / 47.97 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
⌀75 × 117 mm
550 g (1.21 lb / 19.40 oz)
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is 123mm longer and 6mm wider than AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z.
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is 810 g heavier than AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
Reasons to choose the AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Aspherical, 3 ED, 1 HR
- ✓
Weight
550 g vs 1360 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
117 mm vs 240 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
75 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.26 × vs 0.25 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Min focus distance
Both 38 cm
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Nikon Z mount compatibility
Cons
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z at major authorized retailers.
Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Viltrox AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.