Sony
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Sony E Mount
The standard telephoto zoom, completely redesigned to be 29% lighter and significantly sharper.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2021
Viltrox
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
Nikon Z Mount
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z — 28–75mm f/2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the viltrox lineup.
$699
Launch priceReleased Apr 2023
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z is 1.5 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Wins
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has higher OIS effectiveness (4.5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z has lower Weight (550 g vs 1045 g)
- BAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z has lower Length (117 mm vs 200 mm)
- BAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z has lower Diameter (75 mm vs 88 mm)
- AFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has higher Max magnification (0.3 × vs 0.26 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
⌀88 × 200 mm
1045 g (2.30 lb / 36.86 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
⌀75 × 117 mm
550 g (1.21 lb / 19.40 oz)
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II is 83mm longer and 13mm wider than AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z.
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II is 495 g heavier than AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 XA, 1 Aspherical, 1 Super ED…
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
4.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II supports it
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.3 × vs 0.26 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Aspherical, 3 ED, 1 HR
- ✓
Weight
550 g vs 1045 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
117 mm vs 200 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
75 mm vs 88 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
38 cm vs 40 cm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Pros
- ✓Extremely lightweight for an f/2.8 telephoto zoom (only 1045g)
- ✓Virtually instantaneous and silent autofocus with 4 XD Linear motors
- ✓Stunning optical performance and contrast across entire range
- ✓Outstanding built-in Optical SteadyShot stabilization
- ✓Dedicated physical aperture ring with click and lock switches
Cons
- –Very high price tag
- –Lens hood is bulky and can block storage space easily
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Nikon Z mount compatibility
Cons
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II and AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z at major authorized retailers.
Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Viltrox AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.