Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS

Micro Four Thirds Mount

M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS — 100–400mm f/5-6.3 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Sep 2020

vs
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II

Sony

FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II

Sony E Mount

The ultimate standard zoom — incredibly sharp, exceptionally compact, and built for professionals.

$2,299

Launch price

Released Apr 2022

FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II is 1.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

Wins

6categories

FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II

LandscapeSports & Action

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS wins 1 categories·FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II wins 4 categories
  • AM.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS has higher OIS effectiveness (3 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Min focus distance (21 cm vs 130 cm)
  • BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/6.3)
  • BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/5)
  • BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Length (120 mm vs 205.7 mm)

Key specs at a glance

M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 ISFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Focal Length100-400 mm24-70 mm
Max Aperturef/5-6.3f/2.8
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
CoverageMicro Four ThirdsFull Frame
Stabilization3 stopsNo
Weight1120 g695 g
Min Focus130 cm21 cm
Filter Size72 mm82 mm

Size and weight, to scale

M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS

86 × 206 mm

1120 g (2.47 lb / 39.51 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II shown to scale

FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II

88 × 120 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS is 86mm longer and 2mm narrower than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.

M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS is 425 g heavier than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.

Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseM.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 ISFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Portrait
5.5Fair
4.5Fair
Sports & Action
4.5Fair
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
5.0Fair
Landscape
4.0Fair
7.0Good
Travel
5.0Fair
5.5Fair
Wildlife
8.5Excellent
3.0Limited
Macro & Close-up
3.5Limited
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS

  • Special elements

    Adds 4 ED, 2 Super HR, 2 HR

  • OIS effectiveness

    3 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Optical stabilization

    Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS supports it

  • Diameter

    86.4 mm vs 88 mm — lower is better

Reasons to choose the FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II

  • Special elements

    Adds 2 XA (extreme aspherical), 3 Aspherical, 2 ED…

  • Min focus distance

    21 cm vs 130 cm — lower is better

  • Max aperture (Tele)

    f/2.8 vs f/6.3 — lower is better

  • Max aperture (Wide)

    f/2.8 vs f/5 — lower is better

  • Length

    120 mm vs 205.7 mm — lower is better

  • Weight

    695 g vs 1120 g — lower is better

  • Max magnification

    0.32 × vs 0.29 × — higher is better

Shared specifications

Internal focus

Both support internal focus

Weather sealing

Both support weather sealing

Control ring

Both support control ring

Custom function button

Both support custom function button

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS

Pros

  • Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
  • Built-in optical image stabilization
  • Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting

Cons

  • Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
  • Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance

FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II

Pros

  • Outstanding sharpness across the entire zoom range
  • Remarkably small and lightweight for an f/2.8 zoom
  • Four XD Linear focus motors provide blazing-fast AF tracking
  • Excellent close-up magnification
  • De-clickable aperture ring and customized function buttons

Cons

  • No built-in optical image stabilization (relies on body IBIS)
  • High launch price
  • Aperture ring can be easily bumped if not locked

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS and FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II at major authorized retailers.

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS

Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Focal length (Min)
100 mm
24 mm
Focal length (Max)
400 mm
70 mm
Max aperture (Wide)
f/5
f/2.8+1.7 stops wider
Max aperture (Tele)
f/6.3
f/2.8+2.3 stops wider
Elements
21
20
Groups
14
15
Special elements
4 ED, 2 Super HR, 2 HR
2 XA (extreme aspherical), 3 Aspherical, 2 ED, 2 Super ED
M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Min focus distance
130 cm
21 cm−109 cm less
Max magnification
0.29 ×
0.32 ×+10%
Autofocus motor
MSC
4 XD Linear Motors
Internal focus
Yes
Yes
M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Optical stabilization
Yes
No
OIS effectiveness
3 stops
0 stops
M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Weight
1120 g
695 g−425 g less
Length
205.7 mm
120 mm−86 mm less
Diameter
86.4 mm−2 mm less
88 mm
Filter thread size
72 mm
82 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes
Diaphragm blades
9
11
M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F5.0-6.3 IS
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Sony E
Format coverage
Micro Four Thirds
Full Frame

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.