OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO — 17mm f/1.2 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2017
Sony
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Sony E Mount
The standard telephoto zoom, completely redesigned to be 29% lighter and significantly sharper.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2021
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II is 3.9 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
Wins
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has higher OIS effectiveness (4.5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO has lower Weight (390 g vs 1045 g)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO has lower Length (87 mm vs 200 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareM.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
⌀68 × 87 mm
390 g (0.86 lb / 13.76 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
⌀88 × 200 mm
1045 g (2.30 lb / 36.86 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO is 113mm shorter and 20mm narrower than FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO is 655 g lighter than FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
- ✓
Weight
390 g vs 1045 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
87 mm vs 200 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
18 cm vs 40 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 DSA, 3 ED
- ✓
Control ring
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO supports it
- ✓
Diameter
68 mm vs 88 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
4.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 XA, 2 ED
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.3 × vs 0.25 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Pros
- ✓Extremely lightweight for an f/2.8 telephoto zoom (only 1045g)
- ✓Virtually instantaneous and silent autofocus with 4 XD Linear motors
- ✓Stunning optical performance and contrast across entire range
- ✓Outstanding built-in Optical SteadyShot stabilization
- ✓Dedicated physical aperture ring with click and lock switches
Cons
- –Very high price tag
- –Lens hood is bulky and can block storage space easily
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO and FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.