OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO — 17mm f/1.2 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2017
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
World-first 2:1 macro telephoto with 5-axis Sync IS and IP53 weather sealing.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased Feb 2023
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO is 5.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO has higher OIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO has higher Max magnification (2 × vs 0.25 ×)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/3.5)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/3.5)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO has lower Length (87 mm vs 136 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareM.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
⌀68 × 87 mm
390 g (0.86 lb / 13.76 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
⌀69 × 136 mm
453 g (1.00 lb / 15.98 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO is 49mm shorter and 1mm narrower than M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO is 63 g lighter than M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 DSA, 3 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/3.5 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/3.5 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
87 mm vs 136 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
18 cm vs 22.4 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
390 g vs 453 g — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
68 mm vs 69 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Max magnification
2 × vs 0.25 × — higher is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Super ED, 2 ED
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO supports it
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.