OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
Lightweight 40–150mm travel telephoto with F4 constant aperture and IP53 sealing.
$699
Launch priceReleased Feb 2020
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
World-first 2:1 macro telephoto with 5-axis Sync IS and IP53 weather sealing.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased Feb 2023
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO is 3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO has higher OIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO has higher Max magnification (2 × vs 0.21 ×)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO has lower Min focus distance (22.4 cm vs 70 cm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO has lower Length (99.9 mm vs 136 mm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO has lower Weight (382 g vs 453 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
⌀69 × 100 mm
382 g (0.84 lb / 13.47 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
⌀69 × 136 mm
453 g (1.00 lb / 15.98 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO is 36mm shorter and 1mm narrower than M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO is 71 g lighter than M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 1 Super ED, 1 HR
- ✓
Length
99.9 mm vs 136 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
382 g vs 453 g — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
68.5 mm vs 69 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Max magnification
2 × vs 0.21 × — higher is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
22.4 cm vs 70 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Super ED, 1 Aspherical
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/3.5 vs f/4 — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.