OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
600mm-equiv. F4 super-telephoto with Sync IS (6 stops), 1475g weight, removable rotating tripod collar, and PRO weather sealing.
$3,499
Launch priceReleased Feb 2016
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
Lightweight 40–150mm travel telephoto with F4 constant aperture and IP53 sealing.
$699
Launch priceReleased Feb 2020
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO is 4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO has higher OIS effectiveness (4 stops vs 0 stops)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO has lower Weight (382 g vs 1475 g)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO has lower Length (99.9 mm vs 227 mm)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO has lower Min focus distance (70 cm vs 140 cm)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO has lower Diameter (68.5 mm vs 92.5 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
⌀93 × 227 mm
1475 g (3.25 lb / 52.03 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
⌀69 × 100 mm
382 g (0.84 lb / 13.47 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO is 127mm longer and 24mm wider than M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO is 1093 g heavier than M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Super ED, 3 HR, 1 E-HR
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
4 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.24 × vs 0.21 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 2 ED, 1 Super ED…
- ✓
Weight
382 g vs 1475 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
99.9 mm vs 227 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
70 cm vs 140 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
68.5 mm vs 92.5 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/4
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/4
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.