OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Micro Four Thirds Mount
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro — 60mm f/2.8 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.
$549
Launch priceReleased Aug 2019
Tamron
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Sony E Mount
An incredibly popular third-party zoom updated with vastly improved sharpness and autofocus.
$899
Launch priceReleased Aug 2021
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 is 2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Wins
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Weight (185 g vs 540 g)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.37 ×)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Length (82 mm vs 118 mm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Diameter (60 mm vs 76 mm)
- B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Min focus distance (18 cm vs 19 cm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
⌀60 × 82 mm
185 g (0.41 lb / 6.53 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
⌀76 × 118 mm
540 g (1.19 lb / 19.05 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is 36mm shorter and 16mm narrower than 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is 355 g lighter than 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Weight
185 g vs 540 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.37 × — higher is better
- ✓
Length
82 mm vs 118 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
60 mm vs 76 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 LD, 2 GM
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
18 cm vs 19 cm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Pros
- ✓Superb value for money compared to first-party options
- ✓Excellent sharpness throughout the range, even at f/2.8
- ✓Very lightweight and compact (only 540g)
- ✓Fast VXD linear motor focus drive
- ✓Customizable lens functions via Tamron Lens Utility software
Cons
- –Starts at 28mm instead of the wider 24mm standard
- –Slightly weaker corner sharpness at 75mm wide open
- –Weather sealing is basic compared to Sony GM lenses
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro and 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.