Sigma
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Leica L Mount
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art — 105mm f/2.8 for Leica L, a popular choice in the sigma lineup.
$799
Launch priceReleased Jun 2021
Sigma
50mm F1.2 DG DN Art
Sony E Mount
50mm F1.2 DG DN Art — 50mm f/1.2 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sigma lineup.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased May 2021
Released within a month of each other.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Wins
50mm F1.2 DG DN Art
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- A105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.15 ×)
- B50mm F1.2 DG DN Art has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- B50mm F1.2 DG DN Art has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- A105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art has lower Weight (715 g vs 946 g)
- A105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art has lower Length (139.2 mm vs 182 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
⌀79 × 139 mm
715 g (1.58 lb / 25.22 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
50mm F1.2 DG DN Art
⌀81 × 182 mm
946 g (2.09 lb / 33.37 oz)
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art is 43mm shorter and 2mm narrower than 50mm F1.2 DG DN Art.
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art is 231 g lighter than 50mm F1.2 DG DN Art.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 SLD, 2 Aspherical
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.15 × — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
715 g vs 946 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
139.2 mm vs 182 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
78.9 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
29.5 cm vs 30 cm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 50mm F1.2 DG DN Art
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical, ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Control ring
Only 50mm F1.2 DG DN Art supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 50mm F1.2 DG DN Art supports it
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Pros
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
50mm F1.2 DG DN Art
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art and 50mm F1.2 DG DN Art at major authorized retailers.
Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Sigma 50mm F1.2 DG DN Art
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.