Fujifilm
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR — 120mm f/4 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$2,699
Launch priceReleased Jan 2019
Sigma
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Leica L Mount
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art — 105mm f/2.8 for Leica L, a popular choice in the sigma lineup.
$799
Launch priceReleased Jun 2021
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art is 2.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Wins
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
TL;DR — Key differences
- AGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- B105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art has lower Weight (715 g vs 1520 g)
- B105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.5 ×)
- B105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art has lower Min focus distance (29.5 cm vs 45 cm)
- B105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
⌀89 × 152 mm
1520 g (3.35 lb / 53.62 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
⌀79 × 139 mm
715 g (1.58 lb / 25.22 oz)
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR is 13mm longer and 10mm wider than 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art.
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR is 805 g heavier than 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR supports it
Reasons to choose the 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 SLD, 2 Aspherical
- ✓
Weight
715 g vs 1520 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.5 × — higher is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
29.5 cm vs 45 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
78.9 mm vs 89 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
139.2 mm vs 152 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Pros
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR and 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Sigma 105mm F2.8 DG DN Macro Art
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.