Fujifilm
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR — 120mm f/4 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$2,699
Launch priceReleased Jan 2019
Fujifilm
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
762mm-equiv. super-telephoto at only 1335g with 5.5-stop OIS and linear AF.
$3,699
Launch priceReleased Oct 2024
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 5.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Wins
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR has lower Min focus distance (45 cm vs 275 cm)
- AGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR has higher Max magnification (0.5 × vs 0.2 ×)
- AGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR has lower Length (152 mm vs 255.5 mm)
- AGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/4 vs f/5.6)
- AGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/4 vs f/5.6)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
⌀89 × 152 mm
1520 g (3.35 lb / 53.62 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀105 × 256 mm
1335 g (2.94 lb / 47.09 oz)
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR is 104mm shorter and 16mm narrower than XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR.
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR is 185 g heavier than XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
45 cm vs 275 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
152 mm vs 255.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.5 × vs 0.2 × — higher is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/4 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/4 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
89 mm vs 104.5 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 5 ED, 2 Super ED
- ✓
Weight
1335 g vs 1520 g — lower is better
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5.5 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR and XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Fujifilm XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.