Fujifilm
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR — 120mm f/4 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$2,699
Launch priceReleased Jan 2019
Sony
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Sony E Mount
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS — 90mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$1,099
Launch priceReleased Jun 2015
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR is 3.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Wins
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has lower Weight (602 g vs 1520 g)
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.5 ×)
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has lower Min focus distance (28 cm vs 45 cm)
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
⌀89 × 152 mm
1520 g (3.35 lb / 53.62 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
⌀81 × 134 mm
602 g (1.33 lb / 21.23 oz)
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR is 18mm longer and 8mm wider than FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS.
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR is 918 g heavier than FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Custom function button
Only GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR supports it
Reasons to choose the FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Weight
602 g vs 1520 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.5 × — higher is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
28 cm vs 45 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
134 mm vs 152 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
81 mm vs 89 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
OIS effectiveness
Both 5 stops
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR and FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 120mm F4 R Macro OIS WR
Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.