Sony
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II — 16–35mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Aug 2023
Sony
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Sony E Mount
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS — 90mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$1,099
Launch priceReleased Jun 2015
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 8.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Wins
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.32 ×)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Min focus distance (22.1 cm vs 28 cm)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Length (111.5 mm vs 134 mm)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Weight (547 g vs 602 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 112 mm
547 g (1.21 lb / 19.29 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
⌀81 × 134 mm
602 g (1.33 lb / 21.23 oz)
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 23mm shorter and 7mm wider than FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS.
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 55 g lighter than FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Custom function button
Only FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
22.1 cm vs 28 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
111.5 mm vs 134 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
547 g vs 602 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.32 × — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS supports it
- ✓
Diameter
81 mm vs 87.8 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II and FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS at major authorized retailers.
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.