Sony
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Sony E Mount
World's lightest 300mm F2.8 — 1470g with XD Linear AF, OSS, and G Master resolution.
$6,999
Launch priceReleased Jan 2024
Sony
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Sony E Mount
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS — 90mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$1,099
Launch priceReleased Jun 2015
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS is 8.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Wins
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has lower Min focus distance (28 cm vs 200 cm)
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.16 ×)
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has lower Weight (602 g vs 1470 g)
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has lower Length (134 mm vs 265 mm)
- BFE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS has lower Diameter (81 mm vs 124 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareFE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
⌀124 × 265 mm
1470 g (3.24 lb / 51.85 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
⌀81 × 134 mm
602 g (1.33 lb / 21.23 oz)
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS is 131mm longer and 43mm wider than FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS.
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS is 868 g heavier than FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Super ED, 1 ED
- ✓
Custom function button
Only FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS supports it
Reasons to choose the FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Min focus distance
28 cm vs 200 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
602 g vs 1470 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
134 mm vs 265 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
81 mm vs 124 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
OIS effectiveness
Both 5 stops
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS and FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS at major authorized retailers.
Sony FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.